SHIKIMIKIE: My Reaction
Showing posts with label My Reaction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label My Reaction. Show all posts

Wednesday 18 September 2013

Wrecking Ball | Porn?

September 18, 2013 0
Wrecking Ball | Porn?
Hola guys! So people are kind of freaking out when this came out. I was like, wrecking what? Because you know I don't have a problem with her recent music video We Can't Stop and then this music video came out. I watched it late.


Well let's go straight to what most people think. It's unhygienic. Okay. I don't know what all of those people are thinking but I don't think they got that sledgehammer straight from a toolbox and then used it straight away for Miley to lick. I don't think Miley is that stupid to lick that thing without making sure that the hammer is clean as it can be. Next, the wrecking ball itself. She rode that swaying thing with and without underpants. That part I can somehow understand but I still don't think that the ball wasn't wiped with antibacterial shiz before she rode it. Or it was probably sprayed with antibacterial stuff so let's just stop at that. 


Porn? Yes it might not be appropriate for other people but it's not that pornographic. It's kind of sensitive but yeah. We shouldn't probably question her decision of making that because she's an adult but I agree that she should have considered that most of her fans came from watching her as Hannah Montana so the fans may not be of proper age yet to watch her do that but yeah. Well that's life. 


The song is alright. I kind of like it because it actually makes sense. Way better than We Can't Stop if you ask me. Although I don't really understand both. Except for some lines. Huh? What people can do is to stop watching it if they don't like it. It'll make their lives easier. And for parents/guardians, guide the kids perhaps? Well that's all! :)

Wednesday 6 February 2013

Russian Roulette.

February 06, 2013 0
Russian Roulette.
With all the bombings that happened recently that involved firearms and such, it has been a controversy whether or not private individuals should be allowed to carry one.

And I would like to share my reaction on this whole issue.

Recently, Sandy Hook was attacked by a guy named Adam and shot 26 innocent individuals.

See, I agree that people should be able to defend themselves in the best way possible but there should be a certain place where to get it and there should be a series of psychologic exams to be able to acquire one.

Because gun control wouldn't actually do anything good to anyone. It's not like criminals would just back off when it's finally implemented. It's not like bad people are actually waiting for this gun control to happen for them to start a new beginning. No. The thing is, since they're still out there with their guns, what about the good guys? It's not like the bad guys would just drop off their guns if they saw that their victims don't have guns and that they would just fight manually instead. It's not fair.

So what I'm trying to say basically is that if they allow private individuals to acquire guns, then there might be a lesser chance of murder and all that because bad people would hesitate a little bit. They wouldn't feel superior and just kill anybody. Think of it this way. There's a two room apartment and there's an armed man who wants to rob the place. The first room is where a normal person lives and the other one is where an armed person lives. The robber is actually aware of the whole situation. Where do you think will he go? Exactly my point.

Can I just share something?

Few years back, when we were on our way home from the airport, just few blocks away from our house, I saw a group of teenagers and one of them was holding a gun. I was threatened because they didn't appear to have a license to be holding that gun and stuff so that was scary as shizz.

We do have a gun in this house. My mom is actually licensed to carry a gun. My dad actually used to fire that gun in a shooting range but not anymore. Now would we use that if an intruder comes in this house, definitely.

Personally, I would like to have one in the future. For security, not for anything else.

Wednesday 26 December 2012

My Reaction. Dentist Effery.

December 26, 2012 0
My Reaction. Dentist Effery.


But I agree that girls should dress accordingly.

“A dentist acted legally when he fired an assistant that he found attractive simply because he and his wife viewed the woman as a threat to their marriage, the all-male Iowa Supreme Court ruled Friday.
The court ruled 7-0 that bosses can fire employees they see as an “irresistible attraction,” even if the employees have not engaged in flirtatious behavior or otherwise done anything wrong.”

Can I just say WTH? Is it the woman's fault if she was born lucky and pretty and attractive?

If she flirted with/to the dentist, then this is reasonable. But just being attractive alone? It doesn't make much sense to me. Sorry.

Is it the assistant's fault that the dentist is weak and would fall into temptation? Is it the assistant's fault that he is not happy how his wife looks? Is it the assistant's fault that the dentist's wife doesn't trust his husband? Is it the assistant's fault that the wife is insecureNO. And because of that, I find this whole thing unfair.

It's actually quite annoying actually. What if everyone would find her a threat? Who would hire her? Ugh whatever. Annoying.

And like, WTH is this all about? Like, if I am the boss and I am pissed off, I could say that they are all attractive and just fire them all, yeah? Without having to finish existing contracts and all that.

And why the hell would the dentist ask her about that orgasm thing? Is he nuts or what? Who would do that? Not a married man I suppose.

This is all effed up.

Thursday 15 November 2012

My Reaction. IU and Eunhyuk.

November 15, 2012 0
My Reaction. IU and Eunhyuk.


 

I'm quite left behind on what's happening on the crazy world of K-pop. Lame, I know.

I'm personally not a fan of IU. She's kind of good but for me, not really my type. Okay whatever. Not really my point.

So basically, IU posted this photo on her Twitter account and people went wild over it. Like, why is Eunhyuk NAKED?

Rumor has it that Eunhyuk visited IU because she was sick and stuff so yeah.

NO BIG DEAL.

And I don't know what's wrong with some NETIZENS nowadays or like even before. It's just not logical anymore.

LET ME HELP YOU.

First of all, it must be the angle of the camera. If it'll be tilted to the right a little bit

With my poor editing skills, here's what I was able to do.

Okay whatever.

And with the Korean entertainment industry being all strict with having relationships and all that, I don't think IU is that stupid to actually post something like them laying in bed and all that.

To my second point now.

If you would actually pay attention, it's kind of clear that Eunhyuk is not naked. ENTIRELY. I mean, who knows? But for people to actually say that he's shirtless is unacceptable.

With my poor editing skills again, here's what I got.

The things I do to prove my point is just. Awesome. LOL. Okay so unless he's really color green in that part, then your argument is invalid.

That's why our teachers are always reminding us not to believe everything we see on the Internet is somehow helpful. Because there are a lot of craps really.

I actually don't have a third point. LOL.

But whatever.

I don't actually believe that there's something going on here. Or if ever there is, I say we leave them alone.

IU is kind of young but Eunhyuk is definitely legal. I mean, I hope he knows what he's doing at this point of his life.

Oh well.

Let me just point out that Eunhyuk looks sicker in this picture than IU is. Mmm.. Okay that's all.